|
|
Post by cliffclive on Jun 6, 2015 14:25:34 GMT
smh
|
|
|
|
Post by wwfknowyourrole on Jun 6, 2015 14:27:38 GMT
conservatives 4 da win m8
|
|
|
|
Post by cliffclive on Jun 6, 2015 14:28:14 GMT
conservatives 4 da win m8 so tru |
|
|
|
Post by therussianpenguin on Jun 6, 2015 14:37:51 GMT
wish i knew wot either of those meant
|
|
|
|
Post by cliffclive on Jun 6, 2015 14:40:56 GMT
wish i knew wot either of those meant Democrats, who are called liberals, want a stronger federal government because they think government can help people by being active in society. Republicans, who are called conservatives, want a weaker federal government because they think that government is only a necessary evil. |
|
Boatz
Fully Loaded Sex Master
Posts: 155
|
Post by Boatz on Jun 6, 2015 16:06:13 GMT
Conservatives da bess, fuck libtards lmaoo
|
|
|
|
Post by cliffclive on Jun 6, 2015 19:28:47 GMT
Conservatives da bess, fuck libtards lmaoo Liberal Vesti members are always complaining about the worsening state of the USA, but they don't realize it's because of liberals. |
|
|
|
Post by thecasualarts on Jun 7, 2015 15:00:51 GMT
either deregulation or excessive government bureaucracy results in the same thing: Unchecked and often invisible corruption.
The unchecked free market obviously destroys the poor, because the wealthy can rent-seek as much as they want, exploiting an uneducated poor.
On the other side of the coin: Fiscal spending designed to redistribute wealth also often ends up benefiting the rent-seeking bureaucracy, not the poor. As taxes rise, so too does the opportunity for TAX EVASION, which benefits the rich much more than it does the poor. "social projects" (ostensibly to help the poor) may just be a front for the bureaucratic elite to get paid.
In the end: it is very hard to design as system in which the poor don't get fucked. And if you're either either uber liberal, or on the far right, you're an idiot.
|
|
|
|
Post by wwfknowyourrole on Jun 7, 2015 16:37:45 GMT
either deregulation or excessive government bureaucracy results in the same thing: Unchecked and often invisible corruption. The unchecked free market obviously destroys the poor, because the wealthy can rent-seek as much as they want, exploiting an uneducated poor. On the other side of the coin: Fiscal spending designed to redistribute wealth also often ends up benefiting the rent-seeking bureaucracy, not the poor. As taxes rise, so too does the opportunity for TAX EVASION, which benefits the rich much more than it does the poor. "social projects" (ostensibly to help the poor) may just be a front for the bureaucratic elite to get paid. In the end: it is very hard to design as system in which the poor don't get fucked. And if you're either either uber liberal, or on the far right, you're an idiot. the sloth cafe is getting deep |
|
